Or you used "smaller than 100" as mailnews.tcptimeout then you increased to 100? Is "default of mailnews.tcptimeout" not 100 in Tb 17 on other than Win? I use Tb 17 on Win-XP and I don't know default of mailnews.tcptimeout in Tb 17 on other OS. Therefore, "increasing the server timeout to 100" sounds pretty strange for me. I tried increasing the serverĪFAIK, default of mailnews.tcptimeout=100(sec). (In reply to Josh Berkus from comment #7) But the fact that I'm using SSL/TLS, and that some things like Inbox work fine, suggest to me that this has something to do with TB. If it's not TB's fault, then regardless TB should still fail in a more graceful way than "inexplicably cannot save sent mail or access some, but not all, folders, seemingly at random". While this might suggest that it's an issue in the network's configuration, as I said I connect using SSL/TLS and without a proxy config, and *some* folders like Inbox do work fine. This only happens on certain networks, consistently on public wifi in certain libraries. (However Inbox always seems to work, as do *some* folders I can always receive new mail.) Whenever this bug occurs, I find that I'm also never able to access Archives, nor Sent Mail, nor various other folders on that same account. It may be network-level antivirus or proxy, but I connect to both SMTP and to IMAP using forced SSL/TLS, without any special proxy configuration.Īlso note that this does not just affect Sent Mail. This is definitely not due to client-side antivirus, as I'm running TB on Ubuntu 12.04 without an antivirus. Please surely isolate this kind of "interfere of anti-virus software" and "actual delay of OK response from IMAP server", please. In this case, "actual IMAP server for Tb" is local IMAP proxy server. #Thunderbird for mac 45.4.0 change stored passwords software#Tbport=143, IMAP proxy server by anti-virus software actual IMAP server If IMAPS,(SSL is used), this kind of virus scan is usually done by local proxy server. So, even if IMAP server returns OK response wihin reasonable time, it takes sufficiently long for Tb. And, after last data chunk is sent from Tb, virus scanner checks entire mail data, and send entire mail data to IMAP server. Virus scan for IMAP mail data by client side anti-virus software.Ĭlient side virus scanner hooks Tb's mail data send, and saves mail data in his buffer. This timeout is not so large but is never too small in ordinal environment, even if it's small for some recent IMAP servers which can be sometimes called not-so-well-configured.Ī known reason of "delay of OK response after last data chunk send in APPEND" is It's timeout for "OK response after last data chunk send in APPEND command execution". > Clearly some TB developer hard-coded a very short timeout into "save sent", (snip) (In reply to Josh Berkus from comment #11) Screen shots of the error cycle attached in a moment. So the issue appears to be server-independant as well. Note that I've encountered this error with 4 different accounts being stored on 3 different servers using 3 different IMAP software packages. Given the inconsistency in encountering the issue, I suspect that it's triggered by something happening on the server, such as a slow response in saving the message to Sent, or something else. Note that I've experienced this both on Mac and on Linux, so this appears to be a platform-independant bug.Ģ) have the Sent folder stored on the mailserver, NOT on the local machineģ) use the account to send mail for a couple of weeks In most cases, the actual message does get sent, but in a few, it appears not to have been sent. I also cannot save the message to Drafts. Repeated attempts to save the message to Sent are without result, until the "bad period" is over. The pattern is that for around 1-3 hours, any email I send will get the "error saving message to sent" error. Unfortunately, I didn't record which version of TB was specifically affected, but this happens regularly. I've been getting this error message sporadically on various accounts as well for the last 6-9 months.
0 Comments
It includes proper manners for sending e-mail, conversing online, and so on. To overcome some of this ambiguity, many users are taking advantage of emotion icons (emoticons) and acronyms to portray their feelings, emotions and facial expressions. netiquette, abbreviation of Internet etiquette or network etiquette, guidelines for courteous communication in the online environment. This may lead to some ambiguity or miscommunication between users. These points are important when we consider that e-mail, bulletin boards and blogs often only reveal the text which the user has posted. The rules or etiquette of use ensure that users of technology know of and can follow rules to ensure that they do not offend other users and that what they communicate to others is understandable. Compress files where appropriate, ensure you only send things across once and send it to the people who need it.Refers to the rules or guidelines that users should follow when communicating with others over the Internet. You can save people's data limit and time by being considerate with what you send or share. Even with ultra-fast fibre optic, large files can take some time and people need the capacity to store what they have downloaded. If you are sending something, you need to be conscious of how the receiver will access the file. This issue is still very relevant as people may be accessing the internet via dial-up (slow), mobile networks (variable), broadband or fibre optic. When considering data limits - or bandwidth (the information-carrying capacity of the network), it is important to acknowledge storage and network speed limitations. Facebook is great for personal stuff whereas ResearchGate is better for academic discussions. Social networks can help you achieve that by focusing your contributions towards appropriate networks. Instead, you need to spend time focusing your message and sending it to the relevant people. With modern technology, it is too easy to send a message to everybody in your contact list. It is important that you direct messages to the right people. Shea (2011) argues "it's your responsibility to ensure that the time they spend reading your posting isn't wasted". When you post anything online, write an email or share a post it will take other people's time to read. To some extent, the practice of netiquette depends on understanding how e-mail, the Usenet, chatting, or other aspects of the Internet actually work or are practiced. The need for a sense of netiquette arises mostly when sending or distributing E-mail, posting on USENET groups, or chatting. Think carefully about what kind of digital citizen you want to be! Since the Internet changes rapidly, its netiquette does too, but it's still usually based on the Golden Rule. This includes small and independent websites just as much as it affects larger corporations. For example, if you use a program like AdBlocker, you are cutting off the revenue streams of the websites you visit. These ethical choices are not necessarily associated with law, but the decisions you make online demonstrate your ethical stances. Just like any other decisions we make, what we do online has ethical implications. Artists, companies, internet providers and law enforcement agencies are continuing to prosecute people who illegally access and/or their material. These activities are a huge loss of revenue for artists and companies. It is the online equivalent of shoplifting. Illegal streaming of movies, illegal downloading of music and copyright infringement is still breaking the law. It can however be easy to let your ethics slip when online. In life, people generally follow the law. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |